Headline News
Cabrini: A Saint for All Seasons (March 31, 2024 5:56 pm)
Dune Part Two: Will Three Be a Crowd? (March 20, 2024 10:09 am)
Dave’s Top 10 of 2023! (March 2, 2024 8:37 am)
Anatomy Of A Fall: Compelling Courtroom Drama (February 20, 2024 11:20 pm)

Mary Poppins Returns: A Must For Kite and Umbrella Fans!

February 13, 2019
Comments off
871 Views

This Disney sequel to the all-time classic “Mary Poppins,” staring Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke (1964), isn’t a great movie like it’s predecessor, but it’s still a very enjoyable film.  The soundtrack isn’t superb like the original, but there are still catchy, original tunes with good lyrics.  The special effects and animation scenes are even better than the original due to CGI and other advancements in technology since 1964.  The movie received only mediocre reviews, but Robin and I both think it’s worth seeing on the BS.

It’s 1930’s London and the Banks children have grown up.  Michael (Ben Whishaw)’s wife died the year before, leaving the family (Michael, two sons and a daughter) in crisis.  Helping out the family is Michael’s sister, Jane (Emily Mortimer).  Michael was having trouble making ends meet so he took out a loan on his house.  Tragically, Michael doesn’t have the funds to repay the loan and he will lose his beloved home in a week if he doesn’t come up with the funds.

Dropping in from the sky, holding her umbrella, comes Mary Poppins (Emily Blunt) to save the day.  Blunt plays the role differently than Julie Andrews, but she gives a terrific performance.  (Her voice isn’t as good as Julie’s, but it’s good enough.)  Mary Poppins starts taking care of the children, making life fun again for them, filling the void in their lives left by their mother’s death.

The Director (Rob Marshall) gets excellent performances from the ensemble cast, including Lin Manuel-Miranda, Meryl Streep, and Dick Van Dyke, among others.  We loved the dance scenes, too.  If you liked the original – or even if you never saw it – I’d catch this one before it leaves the theaters.  To be “Blunt,” it’s not as magical as “Mary Poppins,” but it still casts a marvelous spell.

 

 

This Disney sequel to the all-time classic "Mary Poppins," staring Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke (1964), isn't a great movie like it's predecessor, but it's still a very enjoyable film.  The soundtrack isn't superb like the original, but there are still catchy, original tunes with good lyrics.  The special effects and animation scenes are even better than the original due to CGI and other advancements in technology since 1964.  The movie received only mediocre reviews, but Robin and I both think it's worth seeing on the BS. It's 1930's London and the Banks children have grown up.  Michael (Ben Whishaw)'s wife died the year before, leaving the family (Michael, two sons and a daughter) in crisis.  Helping out the family is Michael's sister, Jane (Emily Mortimer).  Michael was having trouble making ends meet so he took out a loan on his house.  Tragically, Michael doesn't have the funds to repay the loan and he will lose his beloved home in a week if he doesn't come up with the funds. Dropping in from the sky, holding her umbrella, comes Mary Poppins (Emily Blunt) to save the day.  Blunt plays the role differently than Julie Andrews, but she gives a terrific performance.  (Her voice isn't as good as Julie's, but it's good enough.)  Mary Poppins starts taking care of the children, making life fun again for them, filling the void in their lives left by their mother's death. The Director (Rob Marshall) gets excellent performances from the ensemble cast, including Lin Manuel-Miranda, Meryl Streep, and Dick Van Dyke, among others.  We loved the dance scenes, too.  If you liked the original – or even if you never saw it – I'd catch this one before it leaves the theaters.  To be "Blunt," it's not as magical as "Mary Poppins," but it still casts a marvelous spell.    

8

Great Animation and Special Effects!

Fine Performance By Emily Blunt!
User Rating : No Ratings Yet !
8

I have loved the movies ever since I saw “The Wizard of Oz” as a young boy. When Beatle-mania hit the USA, Rock-N-Roll was my greatest passion, but I haven’t enjoyed the current music scene nearly as much over the past 15 years, so that void has been filled by film. In college and med school, I would see movies with my friends and we would stay up late into the night chatting about them. I still love seeing movies with friends and then having dinner to discuss them. This blog evolved out of my desire to tell my movie-loving friends about movies I thought they would enjoy. The blog allows me to do this in a fun way and to reach movie fans everywhere.

Comments are closed.